Category: Uncategorized
Big John vs OKDMV II
Big John vs OKDMV III
We have added a portal for our clients to log in to see their invoices and to pay online. This is for our Voiceover, Advertising, Oklahoma Public Notary, and other services we provide. Our clients will need to click on the “Clients” link located in the tabs bar on our site (www.thebigjohnshow.com) and will be taken to the login site. If you haven’t gotten your password yet, you should send us an email with your requested password. DO NOT GIVE THE PASSWORD TO ANYONE ELSE NOR WILL WE LET ANYONE ELSE KNOW!!! If you choose to print out your invoice and mail in your payment, you may do so or you can pay online (via Paypal) once you have logged in to the client portal.

We are proud to announce that we have remodeled our online store along with updates for better service and convenience! You can see it by pointing your smartphone or desktop browser to shop.thebigjohnshow.com and let us know what you think. Our online store will continue to have a range of audio products that you hear on the shows (“The Big John Show” & “Bravo Sierra with Big John”) with some physical products from our other brands you can purchase. This is our little space in the world where you can help support the show. You can sign up for email updates, send gift certificates, get additional services from our partners, and more! In addition, we will be adding more to it soon and making minor updates / fixes over the next week. So if you happen to see something glitch, don’t panic, we are working on it behind the scenes. Again, we welcome you to our online store, shop.thebigjohnshow.com, and look forward to serving you in the future!

So I got some feedback about my comments on social media from last night (10/12) concerning other radio stations in Western Oklahoma job performance when it comes to Severe Weather. Funny thing is it wasn’t just from other jocks, but from regional / locally-known artists as well criticizing my “professionalism” for calling out some of the other stations markets. Allow me to make my points and you (whoever) can either agree to disagree or just disappear from my friends list as it makes no difference to sway my mind about the argument. Your loyalty will only get you so far until the listener turns off the radio or changes the station if you song comes on.
First and foremost, who is going to remember what artist or song was playing when the EAS tones come over the radio or the LIVE jock comes on and says “The National Weather Service has issued a Tornado Warning for…”? Are they going to be listening more to the LIVE jock announcing the details (where, when will it be over their specific location, will it be over their destination if they are driving home, work, or to the grocery store, or how much time will they have to get to their tornado shelter?) or do you honestly believe the listener will be complaining that the jock rudely interrupted your song that was playing during that time? If you think the latter, you better get your head checked and maybe that particular listener.
Second, radio stations are supposed to serve the communities for which they are licensed in. One way to serve the community includes keeping them up-to-date on harmful situations that may or may not be caused by Mother Nature. If a radio station has no jock during a serious (and potentially deadly situation), that is going to hurt the credibility of that station and may not save the lives it could have potentially. Radio stations should be helping their community by broadcasting the information that is NEEDED (a.k.a. weather hazards, local area disasters, topical community situations, ect…) because it is a condition of their license issued by the Federal Communications Commission, no matter if they are a Low-Power FM, Non-Profit, or Profit station. Your spins are thrown out the window at that point and no one in radio thinks twice about that.
Third, if a station claims to help the community, it should be LIVE, even during severe weather situations. I’ve done it so many times, even while the funnel cloud when directly over the station. Any good jock worth their salt usually preps ahead of their show. That prep should include watching the weather, days ahead if possible. Just let it stay in the back of their minds as to be prepared for what might be coming. Wouldn’t you do it if you plan on touring? Same concept. The jocks in western Oklahoma had several days in advance to prepare for the possibilities and if they didn’t, that is on them and they should own up to it on-air by apologizing for keeping their listeners un-informed on the hazardous situation possibly coming into their coverage area.
Fourth, in this day and age, technology is everywhere. Smartphones, laptops, desktop computers, tablets, apps, ect… It’s all around us. However, not everyone can be around a TV set or the internet to watch someone else from another market over a hundred miles away to tell them what a Severe Storm is going to do. It’s the main thing I can’t stand about Fayetteville, Arkansas TV stations because they don’t report accurately for Southeastern Oklahoma. That’s why radio is such an important tool and resource for the average listener who is sitting in their storm shelter or driving around in their vehicles. Those folks most likely are listening to the radio for vital information during that time. With that being said, most radio stations have what is called “Remote Capabilities” allowing them to call into the station board or internet connected transceiver (I have a Telos Z/IP one for my personal use along with LUCY app) to broadcast LIVE from a remote location for business or safety reasons (it was heavily used in a lot of markets this past year in the name of COVID-19). So, not a single station can tell me they didn’t have anyone available or able to handle such an important event. If they did not go on the air ahead of time and during the events as they unfolded, they did NOT do their job, it was poor planning on the station managers (or owners) part and it was bad planning on the Jocks part. Plain and simple.
Now, as for the artists (promoters, vendors, & personnel) who were butt-hurt for my harsh suggestions for the stations who were NOT covering the tornadic situation in western Oklahoma, you are only complaining because they might be playing your music. I’m going to tell you something that none of those stations are going to tell you: The only thing any FCC Licensed station has to do is protect the license at all costs. That’s it, plain and simple. Your music is at the bottom of the list and a benefit to you if they actually play it. That is the God’s honest truth. Yes, it can be a partnership, working hand-in-hand with each other, but you know as well as I do that when the song is over, so is the handshake until your song plays again. In between those songs, might be a while if another tornadic storm pops back up. Any station that doesn’t go wall-to-wall during a tornado warning doesn’t care for its listeners. I’m not so sure that would be a station that if I were an artists would want to have my music played on. The listeners are what makes the station. The listeners support the advertisers who then buy advertising on the station that they know the listeners are tuned in on. Your music is a tool to pass the time, not a necessity if the community sees fit. The community must be served well for the station to be successful. I have nothing against your music, but if I have a choice to play your song or warn people about a destructive force heading their way, you better believe I am going to break into that song and crack the mic open for the duration of the warning. If I get any flack for it, the next button I push for that song will be the “Delete” key.

How much you got in loose change in your pockets, couch, or car that could help the fine folks in China? Believe me, you will help these fine folks if our congress passes that Infrastructure bill this week. Thankfully, the Federal Reserve has said they won’t raise the debt ceiling and several members from all sides of congress have said they don’t like the spending it is wanting to do. So we might have a chance at making a lot of that new bill disappear, but how do we know for sure what is in it? I remember not long ago, “Nance” uttered those long painful words from the Obamacare fiasco, “we have to vote on it to know what’s in it”. Since October 1 is the new fiscal year for the US Government, time is not in their favor since they waited to the last minute to push this ginormous kidney stone through hoping it would be rammed in quickly without anyone asking too many questions about the gaping hole it leaves behind.
So here is the short and skinny on why this is so important: Do you remember the “Housing Bubble” of 2008? Many mortgages happened that shouldn’t have because the system was rigged, but the clients didn’t know at the time. It took a few years to build up and finally it popped. Many banks, lenders, financial institutions were making money hand over fist on a raw deal that hurt many families who were just trying to make a better future. Businesses, unions, and other organizations put their money into all these funds that were promised to raise capital for construction of new homes and condos. Homes that were already on the market were fair game as well. When people bought these homes or condos (some that were never finished), they used what is called an “Adjustable Mortgage”, allowing the monthly prices to skyrocket without much notice for whatever reason these companies wanted. Anyone remember the woman who bought an 800K home in the northwest on a school bus drivers salary? That shouldn’t have happened for obvious reasons, but she did see an opportunity, or so she thought. I got conflicting reports that she was able to keep the house because she sued to mortgage company, then I heard she lost it because she didn’t read the contract. So who knows, none of my business. What I do know is that finances are in the top two reasons (statistically) for divorces and families breaking up. Needless to say, many families were hurt because or in direct result of this fiasco. Finally, these institutions suffered a little, the smaller ones became smoke and the bigger ones were left bleeding out massively before the United States Government bailed them out with BILLIONS of American taxpayer dollars. Part of the reason this was allowed to happen was because certain departments / agencies was underfunded by the government. Who handles the US budget?
Now, China has taken what happened in our “Housing Bubble” and said with a big ol’ Texas grin on their face, “hold my Yanjing”. Instead of building neighborhoods of huts and apartments, they build high-tech cities for people to move into. Purchasing the homes of their dreams in China for the average citizen. The only problem is that when you live in a communist country, the average person doesn’t have a whole lot of money. Granted, the communist leaders / lenders rained money down to those who wanted to purchase properties, but the people still didn’t have much to pay back as the contracts they signed dictated. However, a lot of the people didn’t take the bait, nor did they want to put their families at risk of being put into prisons for debt. So no, these new fancy homes and actual cities the Government funded to be built are just sitting fancy where they are, empty, and decollate literally in the middle of nowhere.
Still with me on this? Okay, good because here is the interesting part. Fast forward from a few years back, now we see several companies going down. What the mainstream news isn’t telling you is that several little investment and loan companies have already gone under. Poof, gone because they can’t afford to lose their souls and are now out of the way. The people who worked there are probably in jail selling their organs to pay the bail. This next domino is a major player in the Chinese market. Evergrande, a giant Chinese real estate development group is VERY close to collapsing. The company is currently $300 billion in debt and has warned investors that it might not be able to get out of this one without defaulting. After news spread of the company’s mounting debt, investors showed up at the company’s headquarters beginning late last week demanding money they’re owed from the firm. This is what some investment folks would refer to as “Margin Call”. Others could say this is very similar to what the Federal Reserve is going to do with the United States Government as well in the next few months.
With 200k employees and 1,300+ developments across China, Evergrande is also facing protests from homebuyers and employees who fear that the housing market will collapse as a result. In Evergrande’s implosion, some are seeing echoes of US bank Lehman Brothers’s bankruptcy back during the 2008 “Housing Bubble” that turned into what the Obama Administration liked to call a “Housing Crisis”. That company’s collapse, alone, affected economies around the world and contributed to the 2007–2008 global financial crisis. So there’s some concern that Evergrande’s condition could rattle markets elsewhere…though that hasn’t happened yet. Some might say that the Chinese Communist Government (a.k.a. CCP) will probably step in to prevent Evergrande from triggering a broader meltdown. However, if you were to look at the financial situation in China, that doesn’t quite seem to be possible without some sort of major change in their economy or worse, the possibility of war.
Now considering how the possibility of the latter is almost a 50% chance of happening in this current political climate, even via proxy with what is happening in Afghanistan, it is a pretty scary scenario either way. China has express very real concerning actions to help the Afghanistan people “eradicate terrorism in their country” (https://www.channelnewsasia.com/world/chinas-xi-urges-afghanistan-stamp-out-terrorism-vows-more-aid-2185546). Afghanistan can / would be better without the Taliban, Al Qaida, or any other terrorist group there, but what would China want in return? I can think of a few things: Lithium mining rights, Opium production, territorial expansion, Oil productions, other natural resources, and workers. All in all, that might not be beneficial to the American people or our allies. However, even if China was to do this, it would take serious money that is heavily backed right now, something that is weakening by the day. China’s public debt already stands at 270 percent of GDP, and non-performing loans have hit $466.9 Billion (https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3135883/china-debt-has-it-changed-2021-and-how-big-it-now). In addition to existing economic challenges, real estate giant Evergrande Group has signaled that it may default on payments owed to creditors.
Currently, the conversion is 1 USD = 6.46621 Chinese Yaun and 1 USD = 7.78198 Hong Kong Dollar. The American dollar is much lower, yes, but IMHO, this goes to why I feel that we are going to be the ones who bail out this Chinese company, Evergrande. One question that every American taxpaying citizen should be asking and that every member of congress and the Biden / Harris administration should be answering truthfully is why the “Infrastructure Bill” requiring so much money? By now you may be asking why would Americans be the ones to help bailout China? The reply I would give is “why not?” We all know that Joe Biden and several members of congress are chummy with China. So as much of an argument you could make that I could be wrong about Americans paying for this Chinese companies debt to keep them from failing, I could make that much of an argument back.
Take another step with me down the rabbit hole: Evergrande made $110 billion in sales last year and has $355 billion in assets (https://www.theepochtimes.com/evergrande-default-could-rock-chinas-entire-economy_4000625.html). In June, it failed to pay some commercial paper and the government froze a $20 million bank account. The company now owes total liabilities of $305 billion, making it the most indebted real estate developer in the world. Something else that sticks out like a nail in a tire is that the company is also the largest issuer of dollar junk bonds in Asia. Imagine that, huh? Evergrande owes money to 128 banks and over 121 non-banking institutions, not just in China, but world-wide. Consequently, the company’s stock price has dropped by 90 percent over the past 14 months, while its bonds were trading at 60 to 70 percent below par.
Eventhough Evergrande accounts for about 4% of the total Chinese real estate high-yield debt, the company’s debt is of such significant size that it may pose systemic risk to China’s banking system. Late or defaulted payments by Evergrande could cause a chain reaction of defaults across institutions. An Evergrande sell-off could drive down prices, crashing over-leveraged developers. Authorities worry that this threatens to destabilize the entire real estate sector, which comprises about 30 percent of the Chinese economy. When you consider how much of the United States debt is owned by China, that is about $1.1 Trillion Dollars (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/080615/china-owns-us-debt-how-much.asp). When you add in the fact that the Chinese yuan, like the currencies of many nations, is tied to the U.S. dollar, you get a sense of China’s debt being connected to ours and if they wanted to, they could call us to pay what we owe them to cover their losses not if, but WHEN Evergrande goes down and they see other industries suffering because of it. China own about 5.2% of the United States debt. Japan comes in second with about 4.6%, but Japanese-owned debt doesn’t receive nearly as much negative attention as Chinese-owned debt, ostensibly because Japan is seen as a friendlier nation and the Japanese economy hasn’t been growing at a 7% clip year after year. The other countries that hold the most U.S. debt include the U.K., Brazil, and Ireland.
Now you may be asking yourself why China owns so much of the Unites States debt? There are two main economic reasons Chinese lenders bought up so many U.S. Treasuries bonds. The first and probably most important is that China wants its own currency, the yuan, pegged to the dollar. A currency peg is a policy in which a national government sets a specific fixed exchange rate for its currency with a foreign currency or a basket of currencies. Pegging a currency stabilizes the exchange rate between countries and doing so provides long-term predictability of exchange rates for business planning. This has been common practice for many countries ever since the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944 (https://history.state.gov/milestones/1937-1945/bretton-woods). A dollar-pegged yuan helps keep down the cost of Chinese exports, which the Chinese government believes makes it stronger in international markets. This also reduces the purchasing power of Chinese earners. Dollar-pegging adds stability to the yuan, since the dollar is still seen as one of the safest currencies in the world. The second reason the Chinese want Treasury Bonds is because they are redeemable in US dollars.
Not to add more scare to the already encroaching problem at hand, Over the past several years, China’s corporate debt to GDP ratio has been steadily increasing. In 2017, it hit a record 160 percent, up from 101 percent 10 years earlier. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has made it a priority to rein in the debt, particularly in China’s $10 trillion shadow banking sector. Local government financing vehicles (LGFV) have defaulted on many trust loans in the shadow banking system, but not on a public bond. So far, this year, 915 million of Local government financing vehicles have defaulted. This so-called hidden debt of local governments has become so pervasive that Beijing has named it a national security issue. Every day that passes, the Chinese government realizes that a complete collapse of Evergrande could cause widespread economic turmoil and even civil unrest. The future of Evergrande and the Chinese economy depends on whether or not the central authorities will allow Evergrande to go into default, leaving its creditors high and dry, or if the Chinese Communist Party will intervene in order to maintain stability.
UPDATE:
To everyone who read my post about EverGrande earlier this week and thought / said I was full of Bravo-Sierra: Friday (9/24) “China Tightens Crypto Mining Crackdown, Bans Trading” (https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/09/24/china-tightens-crypto-mining-crackdown-bans-trading/). In other words, no more Crypto-currency buy, selling, or trading. They just got one step closer to creating their own International Trading Crypto currency like Brazil and Venezuela. If you ban crypto entirely to clear all the other competition out of the way, all the Chinese Communist Party has to do is introduce a single Crypto-Currency for everyone in China to use. The next step would be to make it like Brazil and Venezuela when it comes to international commerce when other counties business want to purchase resources or goods. Just like Venezuala does with their oil (Petro, which is backed by Oil). In other words, no more Crypto-currency buy, selling, or trading. They just got one step closer to creating their own International Trading Crypto currency like Brazil and Venezuela. If you ban crypto entirely to clear all the other competition out of the way, all the Chinese Communist Party has to do is introduce a single Crypto-Currency for everyone in China to use.
The next step for would be to make it like Brazil and Venezuela when it comes to international commerce with other countries whose businesses want to purchase resources or goods. Just like Venezuala does with their oil (Petro, which is backed by their oil), other countries have to purchase their virtual currency just to pay for resources and goods manufactured in Brazil. Their citizens can use the normal money and the crypto-currency. Yes, the United States is also considering for a few years now to making their own digital currency, but we haven’t really pushed that idea through to make it happen as of yet. It will be interesting to see what it is backed with because one major game changer in the world economy would be if China backed their digital Yaun with Gold. Why would they do that? Because Gold hardly ever changes value. The American Dollar and other world monies do fluctuate quite a bit depending on each respective country’s economy on the world stage, but Gold is (and always has been) universal. It very rarely changes. Personally, I wish the United States Dollar was still backed by Gold because it would be worth more than oil. We should have never taken it off Gold. There is no denying that we live in interesting times, my friends. The stage is setting up for an interesting show in the fourth quarter of this year so far. November and December is about to be something to remember for sure…

Dear Madam Vice President,
Because the way I see it, if a person is “vaccinated”, they don’t have anything to worry about. The word “Vaccine” means “a preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)”, according to Merriam-Webster (
Hmmmm… So those folks with a variety of ailments and conditions that might suffer more from a certain Presidential mandate just issued could have their rights violated instead of being protected under law? It isn’t the answer, but a possible doorway to solving part of the issue for some people. If you are looking for some place to start with fighting back / defending your freedom against the Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate that President Joe Biden laid out against the American people last Thursday, September 9th (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/09/09/remarks-by-president-biden-on-fighting-the-covid-19-pandemic-3/), you may want to start with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. In particular, Sub-chapter 1 (https://beta.ada.gov/law-and-regs/ada/#subchapter-i—employment-title-i), “Employment” section. In there, there is details on descrimination that could provide a small opening to any chance to have this forced mandate on businesses and their employees to be bypassed without legal consequences on the business. Under under section 12112 – Discrimination:
“(a) General rule
No covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability in regard to job application procedures, the hiring, advancement, or discharge of employees, employee compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.
(b) Construction
As used in subsection (a) of this section, the term “discriminate against a qualified individual on the basis of disability” includes
(1) limiting, segregating, or classifying a job applicant or employee in a way that adversely affects the opportunities or status of such applicant or employee because of the disability of such applicant or employee;
(2) participating in a contractual or other arrangement or relationship that has the effect of subjecting a covered entity’s qualified applicant or employee with a disability to the discrimination prohibited by this subchapter (such relationship includes a relationship with an employment or referral agency, labor union, an organization providing fringe benefits to an employee of the covered entity, or an organization providing training and apprenticeship programs);
(3) utilizing standards, criteria, or methods of administration
(A) that have the effect of discrimination on the basis of disability;
(B) that perpetuates the discrimination of others who are subject to common administrative control;
(4) excluding or otherwise denying equal jobs or benefits to a qualified individual because of the known disability of an individual with whom the qualified individual is known to have a relationship or association;
(5)
(A) not making reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability who is an applicant or employee, unless such covered entity can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the business of such covered entity; or
(B) denying employment opportunities to a job applicant or employee who is an otherwise qualified individual with a disability, if such denial is based on the need of such covered entity to make reasonable accommodation to the physical or mental impairments of the employee or applicant;
(6) using qualification standards, employment tests or other selection criteria that screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability or a class of individuals with disabilities unless the standard, test or other selection criteria, as used by the covered entity, is shown to be job-related for the position in question and is consistent with business necessity; and
(7) failing to select and administer tests concerning employment in the most effective manner to ensure that, when such test is administered to a job applicant or employee who has a disability that impairs sensory, manual, or speaking skills, such test results accurately reflect the skills, aptitude, or whatever other factor of such applicant or employee that such test purports to measure, rather than reflecting the impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills of such employee or applicant (except where such skills are the factors that the test purports to measure).“
Even the Federal Trade Commission has a few things to say concerning the issue. (
https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/no-fear-act/protections-against-discrimination ) “Other laws enforced by both the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) protect Federal employees from certain prohibited personnel practices. According to Section 2302(b) of Title 5 of the United States Code, any employee who has authority to take, direct others to take, recommend or approve personnel actions may not:
- Discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, marital status, or political affiliation.
- Solicit or consider employment recommendations based on factors other than personal knowledge or records of job related abilities or characteristics.
- Coerce an employee’s political activity or take action against any employee as reprisal for refusing to engage in political activity.
- Deceive or willfully obstruct a person’s right to compete for employment.
- Influence any person to withdraw from competition for a position to improve or injure the employment prospects of any other person.
- Give unauthorized preference or advantage to any person to improve or injure the employment prospects of any particular employee or applicant.
- Engage in nepotism.
- Retaliate against an employee or an applicant because of an individual’s legal disclosure of information evidencing wrongdoing (“whistleblowing”).
- Retaliate against an employee or applicant for exercising an appeal, complaint or grievance right; testifying or assisting another in exercising such a right, cooperating with an Inspector General or the Special Counsel, or refusing to obey an order that would break a law.
- Discriminate against an employee based on conduct which is not adverse to on-the-job performance of the employee, applicant, or others. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has interpreted the prohibition of discrimination based on “conduct” to include discrimination based on sexual orientation. See Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Federal Civilian Employment.
- Violate veterans’ preference requirements.
- Violate any law, rule, or regulation which implements or directly concerns the merit principles.”
Now let me ask you this, how many of those do you feel this Covid-19 vaccine mandate violates? No need to subscribe to the Tin Foil Hat Brigade, it’s right there in your face. The people running this Presidential Administration knows it and now so do you. They just choose to ignore the rules and regulations. If you look into the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (
), they say the federal EEO laws do not prevent an employer from requiring all employees physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated for COVID-19, are subject to the reasonable accommodation provisions of Title VII and the ADA and other EEO considerations. These principles apply if an employee gets the vaccine in the community or from the employer. “In some circumstances, Title VII and the ADA require an employer to provide reasonable accommodations for employees who, because of a disability or a sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance, do not get vaccinated for COVID-19, unless providing an accommodation would pose an undue hardship on the operation of the employer’s business. The analysis for undue hardship depends on whether the accommodation is for a disability (including pregnancy-related conditions that constitute a disability) or for religion.”
We have expanded our social media reach and are on Gettr! If you are on there, be sure to connect and stay in contact with us!
Go to https://gettr.com/user/thebigjohnshow
**We are working on a button to add it to our list of social media links. As soon as we have one available, it will be added to the list of links.**
